Seven ideas a week, or fifty. The difference is context.
To maximize product growth using AI agents, you have to build and manage all the context for them, so they produce something connected to your product strategy and business.
Continuum Tracker builds and manages that context for every product you run, automatically. It learns your market first, then sharpens it with your own data as you connect it. You get back ranked, evidence-backed value propositions — each carrying its own context, ready to hand straight to your AI agents.
❯ Take our top 5 customer pain points for Nova Stays and run one agent on each — all in parallel.● Spawning 5 agents concurrently — one per pain point. All five start in the same turn and run at the same time; none of them waits on another.├─●Cancellation Terms Before Payment· 28 evidence├─●Trip Total in Home Currency· 22 evidence├─●Bookings Beside the Card Spend· 19 evidence├─●Changing Dates After Booking· 16 evidence└─●Shared Trips With a Companion· 13 evidence●Task(Cancellation Terms Before Payment)└●Running… · 13 tool uses · ↑ 22.4k tokens · 1m 18s●Task(Trip Total in Home Currency)└●Running… · 11 tool uses · ↑ 18.2k tokens · 1m 06s●Task(Bookings Beside the Card Spend)└●Running… · 10 tool uses · ↑ 15.7k tokens · 58s●Task(Changing Dates After Booking)└●Running… · 8 tool uses · ↑ 9.8k tokens · 47s●Task(Shared Trips With a Companion)└●Running… · 6 tool uses · ↑ 6.1k tokens · 35s✓ 5 agents running on Nova Stays · one shared audit trail
This terminal replays an illustrative example for a digital product. Nova Stays and its features are a hypothetical product, and the real output will differ depending on your own product, data and setup.
Widening the search
The winner is in there. Explore wide enough to find it.
One product has many opportunities, and only a few of them have exponential growth potential. Growth hacking is the work of finding those few. You place as many bets as you can afford, because most lose and the one that wins pays for all of them.
Growth hacking without Continuum Tracker
Test 1–7 ideas per week.
The understanding is yours to do. You have to know the problem well enough to explain it to an agent, and judge for yourself which opportunity looks the most promising. One person can only work through a few growth opportunities a day, so this system is hard to scale.
You assemble the context and the prioritized list yourself
Parallelise pain point exploration
Test 7–50 ideas per week.
Because we assemble the ranked, evidence-backed value propositions, each one arrives with its priority already set and its context already attached — ready to hand to an agent. You create many product prototypes at once, then test them with your product team or with synthetic personas.
We assemble the context for all your pain points, one product at a time
Parallelise product line exploration
Test 50+ ideas per week, per product line.
We can learn any product market ourselves, so even a product line you have no data on still gets full context. It is assembled from the market itself rather than from your customers, and handed to an agent exactly like the rest.
So you can test value propositions using prototypes in markets you have never sold into, and run every product line in parallel.
We assemble the context for every product line you have or want to test
How we know
Every priority traces back to a sentence someone said
A sales or customer call goes in. Out come only the sentences that carry a pain point, and why each matters in your product market. The same problem said five ways merges into one user need, ranked by traction. That is where the growth opportunities come from.
We keep the synthesis running, so it is never your job. The judgement is yours — which methodology to apply and what the results mean.
We read years of product development in your product market. Every feature shipped, every product launched. That is how the context gets assembled. Doing it yourself is brutal, even with AI agents.
We keep that context current, so you inherit what already shipped and where real money was spent. Proof of the bets that came before. That depth is what lets an agent understand the customer problem rather than guess at it, and it arrives attached to every one of your ranked, evidence-backed value propositions.
Walk out of a client meeting and just talk to the app. It captures the problems your customer actually described, in the words they used. Nothing gets paraphrased into someone else’s summary, which is why this produces the best context you can give an agent.
Nothing to connect and nothing to configure. We transcribe it, keep the sentences that carry a pain point, and merge them into your ranked list like any other input.
An agent with no evidence invents the user problem
Ask a model what to test and it will answer. It always answers. What comes back is a well-argued hypothesis about a user who does not exist, and five agents asked the same way will produce five polished variants of that same invention — fast, plausible, and anchored to nothing.
We anchor it to market understanding, sharpened by the data you supply.
FAQ
What growth teams ask us first
What is the ranked list?
It is your customer pain points ranked by traction, each one carrying the evidence that put it there: the verbatim quotes, a count of how many independent sources raised it, and which products in your market already shipped something for the same problem.
How does having that list actually help me?
This is the part we are good at. Every item on the customer pain points list arrives with its context attached. Your agent stops guessing what the user problem is and starts building against real examples of what your users said and what your market already shipped.
How long before I have a ranked list?
First results land in about 15 minutes. The app keeps calibrating in the background for the next 24 hours, so the list sharpens on its own after that first pass.
I don’t have much data yet. Is this useless to me?
No. That is the case it was built for. Half the context never comes from you. From your website we work out your market and pull the products closest to yours, so there is something to prioritize against on day one. Your own data sharpens it from there.
Where does the testing happen?
The prototypes are built in Claude Code. The context library lives in Continuum Tracker, and the Continuum Tracker skill pulls it in and hands it to the AI agents. What comes out is a self-contained React app per prototype.
Where do I get testers?
We do not supply testers. Most teams use a recruiting service such as BetaTesting, their own user base or waiting lists. If you want ideas for reaching an audience you do not have yet, read our blog. It covers over 200 growth-hacking methods, each with a real-world example of where that audience was found.
Are these prototypes production code?
No, and deliberately so. Each one is a throwaway React app, frontend only, with dummy data — built to be walked through by a person, not merged. It lands in its own folder that is added to .gitignore the moment it is created, and it never touches your product's source. The point is to learn whether the change is worth building before anybody builds it properly.
I already use Claude or Cursor for prototypes. Why add a tool?
A general LLM works from two things. What you paste in, and what it was trained on. Neither knows your product or its market, so every good answer depends on context you supply, and you supply it again every session. We build that context instead, with nothing for you to set up, and we keep it updated. Your customer evidence, your product history, your market. It stacks on top of the general model rather than replacing it. Change your product strategy and you rebuild nothing.